Research collection
Approved documents, data, and notes gathered in one place and organized around the review questions.
Research and review copilots
We build tools that collect research, compare documents, and draft findings with source links. Reviewers edit the brief and track open questions.
ScopeOne workflow or several connected applications
Delivery timingDays for a focused prototype, weeks for a well-defined release when access and decisions are ready
How we check itA reviewer can trace each important finding to its source, or see that it is still unresolved.
Spend less time assembling the research
Gathering and comparing sources can take longer than judging them. We automate the gathering and comparing, and keep facts, calculations, and interpretation separate so the reviewer can challenge the conclusion.
Good fit
- Due diligence and portfolio teams
- Analysts who prepare recurring research
- Teams whose reviews draw on both documents and data
Not the right fit
- Conclusions that no person will check and sign off
- Research using sources you may not have the right to use
- Reviews where facts and interpretation can’t be kept apart
What you get
Source comparison
Draft findings linked to their sources, with contradictions and missing information pointed out.
Review package
An editable brief for the reviewer, with open questions and a record of every source used.
How it works
Define the review
We agree with your reviewers on the questions, which sources may be used, and what a finished research package includes.
Assemble and compare
We gather and compare the sources, keeping facts, calculations, and AI-generated interpretation clearly separate.
Test the conclusions
Your reviewer checks the draft for unsupported statements, conflicts, and open questions, and we adjust the tool based on what they find.
Scope, cost, and ownership
What we need from you
- A clear research question and permitted source material
- A qualified reviewer responsible for conclusions
What affects cost
- Source volume and format variation
- Comparison criteria and citation requirements
- Review depth and sensitive-information handling
Technical scope
- Source collection
- Summaries linked to evidence
- Comparison workflows
- Open-question tracking
- Reviewer approval
- Audit history
Support and maintenance
Your reviewer checks and approves the conclusions. We agree who maintains source access, investigates incorrect citations, and keeps the research history available.
Common questions
Can it produce a final recommendation?
It produces a draft, with supporting sources. The reviewer checks and approves it and stays responsible for the conclusion.
Can it use numeric and narrative sources?
Yes. It keeps approved figures, documents, and commentary separate while showing how they relate.