Finance · AI consulting and implementation

AI for financial document processing and research.

We build tools that process financial documents, draft research memos, and prepare reporting commentary. Figures stay traceable to their sources, and your reviewers approve the conclusions.

What we can build

Research and reporting applications

These are examples of applications we can build or configure. Follow a link for the requirements and delivery details.

AI research and memo preparation

The tool compares filings, approved research, and meeting notes, then summarizes the evidence and drafts memo sections with citations and open questions.

What you get
A research workspace with cited summaries and editable memo drafts.
What we measure
Citation accuracy, coverage of material evidence, and review effort.
Explore AI research and memo preparation

AI financial document review

The software pulls terms and figures from financial documents and compares them across versions. Discrepancies go to a reviewer alongside the original source.

What you get
A document comparison queue with extracted fields, source references, and review history.
What we measure
Extraction accuracy, discrepancy detection, and correction rates.
Explore AI financial document review

AI reporting commentary

The software drafts commentary on what changed, using approved financial measures and supporting notes. Each draft links to the figures and evidence a reviewer can check.

What you get
A commentary workflow connected to approved reporting data and approval steps.
What we measure
Numerical consistency, evidence coverage, and time to an approved report.
Explore AI reporting commentary

Delivery

How it works

We connect research documents and financial data so reviewers can check draft analysis against its sources. Calculations stay in the approved financial model.

Define the review purpose

We separate the reporting and research the software supports from financial judgments, which stay with your reviewers.

Reconcile the inputs

Before automating anything, we check definitions, adjustments, dates, and which source is authoritative.

Test the review cycle

With the team responsible for the review, we follow discrepancies through correction and approval.

Not sure where AI would help your research or reporting?

An assessment reviews one workflow, its data, and the likely costs, then recommends whether a build is worth it.

See the opportunity and readiness assessment

Working together

What a project involves

We work with investment professionals, finance operations teams, and financial software teams.

We agree on the work, price, and acceptance tests before development starts. Larger projects can be delivered in stages.

Fit and requirements

Good fit

  • Teams handling portfolio reporting and diligence
  • Finance operations teams
  • Teams reviewing financial documents and data
  • Companies building financial software products

Not the right fit

  • Investment or credit decisions made automatically, without a responsible reviewer
  • Figures generated without an approved source to check them against
  • Processes that can’t keep a record of their sources

What we need from you

  • Approved source data and calculation owners
  • Reviewers responsible for financial interpretations and decisions
Timing, cost, and support

Timing

A focused assessment usually takes 1 to 3 weeks once scope and access are agreed. A focused prototype can take days, and a well-defined release can take weeks when access and decisions are ready. We confirm the schedule after reviewing your systems and access.

What affects cost

  • Calculation complexity and reconciliation effort
  • Source rights, access, and audit requirements
  • Reporting frequency and integration breadth

After launch

Your reviewers approve calculations and financial conclusions. The application support plan covers source updates, access changes, and failed integrations.

How we work
Technical scope and testing

Technical scope

  • Approved financial models
  • Document extraction
  • Source-linked summaries
  • Portfolio reporting
  • Access controls
  • Evaluation against reviewed examples

How we check the work

Every important figure can be traced to its source records, calculations, and approved adjustments.

AI evaluation and operations

Training data and synthetic data for finance

Reviewed extraction examples, research questions with source-backed answers, and synthetic financial records with explicit calculation and relationship rules.

AI training data services

We scope the sources, labels, evaluation cases, and release requirements for your domain-specific AI.

See AI training data services

Synthetic test data for your workflows

We build fictional records and difficult scenarios for application development, QA, and demos.

Explore test data services

Need AI that stays on site?

Build internal document review and research tools for material that cannot enter external AI services. Keep source records, reviewer permissions, and consequential decisions under your existing controls.

Explore on-premises AI deployments

Common questions

Can this work with our approved financial models?

Yes. Approved calculations and definitions stay as they are. We improve how information is gathered, reviewed, and explained around them.

Will the system make investment or credit decisions?

Not by default. Those decisions stay with qualified people. Automating any part of them would need a clear policy, a responsible owner, review, and controls matched to the risk.

Which task do you want to improve?

Tell us about the task, the systems involved, and the result you want.

Discuss your AI project