Scenario and generation design
A table of scenarios to cover, the schema and relationships, constraints, rules for any real examples used to guide generation, and a recipe matched to the target use.
We generate examples for the scenarios your existing data does not cover. We check each batch against the required schema and review it for the task it is meant to support.
A missing case might be a rare event, an unusual document layout, or a difficult customer request. We choose a generation method for those cases and check the results against independent reference examples and your task requirements.
A table of scenarios to cover, the schema and relationships, constraints, rules for any real examples used to guide generation, and a recipe matched to the target use.
Generated examples with stable IDs, a record of how each was generated, validation flags, and reviewed rare or difficult cases.
Results for rule compliance, variety, usefulness for the task, and relevant checks for reproduced sensitive data. Failures and limitations stay in the report.
We identify which cases your existing data lacks and agree on baselines for judging realism and usefulness for the task.
We compare candidate methods on a small sample, check facts and relationships, and revise the recipe with feedback from your domain experts.
We test the accepted batch against a separate reference set or task evaluation, then produce a versioned release with its limitations documented.
Each data type needs its own generation recipe and acceptance checks.
We generate tables and linked records for a defined schema, then validate keys, ranges, totals, relationships, and any statistical patterns that approved reference data supports.
We create task prompts, responses, and multi-turn conversations from approved source material or a scenario specification, then review accuracy, variety, speaker roles, format, and labels.
We fill a coverage gap with rare or difficult examples, clearly labeled as generated. The generation assumptions stay visible, and we compare behavior against independent reference cases.
We refresh scenarios and validation as your products change, and rerun usefulness and privacy checks when seed data or generation models change.
No. A system trained or prompted with sensitive source data can reproduce it. We agree on permitted inputs and test for the relevant disclosure risks. Differential privacy is a formal method that limits what the output can reveal about any one record. When it is in scope, it is a separate technical requirement with explicit assumptions and tradeoffs.
Yes, when the use case allows written rules, simulation, or approved domain material. That data can test schemas and workflows. Matching the statistical patterns of real data requires suitable reference data and measurement.
Not necessarily. It has to be tested. We compare the training or evaluation approach against a baseline, using a separate reference set. Poorly designed synthetic data can introduce errors and amplify biases.